Disease marker combination enhances patient characterization in the Finnish sarcoidosis patients.

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory disease of unknown etiology and multiple clinical phenotypes. Clinical manifestations range from asymptomatic disease to severe loss-of-function leading to the hypothesis that sarcoidosis might not be just one disease, but consists of several distinct disease entities each with potentially distinct genetic associations. We have previously demonstrated that in our series HLADRB1* 03:01 and haplotype HLA-DRB1*04:01-DPB1*04:01 are associated with good prognosis sarcoidosis. In our recent work, we found a novel SNP (rs9905945) in the 5'upstream region of the ACE gene to be associated with favorable disease prognosis as well. The main objective of this study was to expand the previous results and analyse combined influence of the found ACE SNP rs9905945 with the protective HLA markers HLADRB1* 03:01 and HLA-DRB1*04:01-DPB1*04:01 in 188 Finnish sarcoidosis patients (resolved disease, n = 90; persistent disease, n = 98). When combining the frequencies of the rs9905945 and of the HLA markers, the strongest association was found for a combination of either/or both HLA markers and rs9905945 for good disease prognosis (37.1% in resolved vs. 11.3% in persistent, p < 0.001, OR = 4.61, (95%CI 2.15-9.86)). In conclusion, we discovered that a combination of the ACE SNP rs9905945 and HLA markers enhance the accuracy for predicting disease course in Finnish sarcoidosis patients further characterizing genetic differences between Finnish sarcoidosis patients with different prognosis.

Global Asthma Network survey suggests more national asthma strategies could reduce burden of asthma

BACKGROUND: Several countries or regions within countries have an effective national asthma strategy resulting in a reduction of the large burden of asthma to individuals and society. There has been no systematic appraisal of the extent of national asthma strategies in the world. METHODS: The Global Asthma Network (GAN) undertook an email survey of 276 Principal Investigators of GAN centres in 120 countries, in 2013-2014. One of the questions was: "Has a national asthma strategy been developed in your country for the next five years? For children? For adults?". RESULTS: Investigators in 112 (93.3%) countries answered this question. Of these, 26 (23.2%) reported having a national asthma strategy for children and 24 (21.4%) for adults; 22 (19.6%) countries had a strategy for both children and adults; 28 (25%) had a strategy for at least one age group. In countries with a high prevalence of current wheeze, strategies were significantly more common than in low prevalence countries (11/13 (85%) and 7/31 (22.6%) respectively, p < 0.001). Interpretation. In 25% countries a national asthma strategy was reported. A large reduction in the global burden of asthma could be potentially achieved if more countries had an effective asthma strategy

No disponible

Global Asthma Network survey suggests more national asthma strategies could reduce burden of asthma.

BACKGROUND: Several countries or regions within countries have an effective national asthma strategy resulting in a reduction of the large burden of asthma to individuals and society. There has been no systematic appraisal of the extent of national asthma strategies in the world. METHODS: The Global Asthma Network (GAN) undertook an email survey of 276 Principal Investigators of GAN centres in 120 countries, in 2013-2014. One of the questions was: "Has a national asthma strategy been developed in your country for the next five years? For children? For adults?". RESULTS: Investigators in 112 (93.3%) countries answered this question. Of these, 26 (23.2%) reported having a national asthma strategy for children and 24 (21.4%) for adults; 22 (19.6%) countries had a strategy for both children and adults; 28 (25%) had a strategy for at least one age group. In countries with a high prevalence of current wheeze, strategies were significantly more common than in low prevalence countries (11/13 (85%) and 7/31 (22.6%) respectively, p<0.001). INTERPRETATION: In 25% countries a national asthma strategy was reported. A large reduction in the global burden of asthma could be potentially achieved if more countries had an effective asthma strategy.

Clinical relevance is associated with allergen-specific wheal size in skin prick testing.

BACKGROUND: Within a large prospective study, the Global Asthma and Allergy European Network (GA(2) LEN) has collected skin prick test (SPT) data throughout Europe to make recommendations for SPT in clinical settings. OBJECTIVE: To improve clinical interpretation of SPT results for inhalant allergens by providing quantitative decision points. METHODS: The GA(2) LEN SPT study with 3068 valid data sets was used to investigate the relationship between SPT results and patient-reported clinical relevance for each of the 18 inhalant allergens as well as SPT wheal size and physician-diagnosed allergy (rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergy). The effects of age, gender, and geographical area on SPT results were assessed. For each allergen, the wheal size in mm with an 80% positive predictive value (PPV) for being clinically relevant was calculated. RESULTS: Depending on the allergen, from 40% (blatella) to 87-89% (grass, mites) of the positive SPT reactions (wheal size ≥ 3 mm) were associated with patient-reported clinical symptoms when exposed to the respective allergen. The risk of allergic symptoms increased significantly with larger wheal sizes for 17 of the 18 allergens tested. Children with positive SPT reactions had a smaller risk of sensitizations being clinically relevant compared with adults. The 80% PPV varied from 3 to 10 mm depending on the allergen. CONCLUSION: These 'reading keys' for 18 inhalant allergens can help interpret SPT results with respect to their clinical significance. A SPT form with the standard allergens including mm decision points for each allergen is offered for clinical use.

Comparing asthma treatment in elderly versus younger patients.

A randomised 6-month study compared two maintenance doses of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort® Turbuhaler® (h) maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART®), 160/4.5 µg 1 × 2 and 2 × 2, in 8053 asthmatics with symptoms despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids ± inhaled long-acting ß2-agonists. This analysis compared response to the two treatments in elderly patients, ≥ 65 years, with that in younger patients. Elderly patients with early- or late-onset asthma were also compared. Elderly patients had lower post-bronchodilator FEV1 percentage predicted normal at baseline than younger patients (85.6% vs. 91.0%, respectively). The elderly had more exacerbations and risk of first severe exacerbation was increased by 55.3% (hazard ratio 1.553; 95% confidence interval: 1.249-1.931, p < 0.0001). However, no differences in exacerbations were seen between 1 × 2 or 2 × 2 budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy treatment in the elderly. Five-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores improved equally in the two age groups. Changes in mean ACQ-5 scores between 1 × 2 and 2 × 2 were significant in both age groups but not clinically relevant (≥ 65 years, 0.12; p = 0.018; <65 years, 0.09; p < 0.0001). Elderly patients with early- and late-onset asthma responded equally well to treatment. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (1 × 2 or 2 × 2) is an effective, well-tolerated and practical treatment concept in elderly and younger asthmatic patients.

True adherence with the Turbuhaler in young children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate true adherence with a dry powder inhaler, the Turbuhaler (TBH), in children with asthma. True adherence was calculated by multiplying adherence to treatment with inhaler competence, that is correct use of the inhaler. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: In an 18-month study, children aged 5-10 years with asthma received twice daily budesonide via a TBH. Parents and children were trained in the correct use of the inhaler before the study started. For each inhalation, peak inspiratory flow through the TBH (PIF(TBH)) was recorded with an electronic pneumotachograph. The PIF(TBH) recordings were used to calculate true adherence for the first and last 45-day periods in the study by multiplying adherence in using the device (percentage of days with PIF(TBH) recordings) with inhaler competence (correct use of inhaler defined as PIF(TBH) values >40 l/min). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: True adherence, adherence, inhaler competence and PIF(TBH). RESULTS: 115 children were treated. The mean (morning and evening) true adherence during the first 45 days was 81.6% (range 78.1-86.4%) and during the last 45 days 57.4% (44.0-66.9%). Mean adherence was 86.0% and 59.3%, whereas mean inhaler competence was 94.7% and 96.2%, respectively. Thus the decline in true adherence was due to the decline in adherence. The largest decline in true adherence occurred in older children. CONCLUSIONS: True adherence with budesonide TBH treatment decreased significantly during the 18-month study due to a decrease in adherence. Inhaler competence with the correct use of the budesonide TBH was high and unchanged over the study period.

Comparison of two twice-daily doses of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy.

The aim of this study was to compare two budesonide/formoterol maintenance doses within the budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy concept and to identify possible patient characteristics at baseline which would predict a better response to a higher than standard maintenance dose. A total of 8,424 patients with symptomatic asthma when using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with or without a long-acting ß(2)-agonist were randomised to budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg, one (1 × 2) or two (2 × 2) inhalations b.i.d. Patients used the same inhaler as needed for symptom relief. The primary outcome variable was time to first severe asthma exacerbation. In the total study population, the time to first severe asthma exacerbation was prolonged by 18% with 2 × 2 versus 1 × 2 (hazard ratio 0.82; p = 0.03). Lung function (peak expiratory flow) was the only statistically significant predictor of a better response to 2 × 2. The mean daily ICS doses were 737 and 463 µg in the 2 × 2 and 1 × 2 groups, respectively. In a real-life setting, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy at the 2 × 2 maintenance dose did prolong time to first severe exacerbation but at a higher medication load. Patients with low lung function benefited most from the higher maintenance dose.

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on metalloproteinase-8 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in the airways of asthmatic children.

BACKGROUND: The effects of corticosteroids on the level and expression of matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8; collagenase-2) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) in airway tissue are poorly characterized in vivo. METHODS: We compared MMP-8 and TIMP-1 levels in induced sputum and their expression in airway inflammatory cells of healthy children (n = 27) and of children with newly diagnosed asthma with mild (n = 20) or moderate symptoms (n = 19), before and after 6 months of treatment with inhaled budesonide. RESULTS: At baseline, MMP-8 was higher in asthmatic children with moderate symptoms, TIMP-1 was lower and the MMP-8/TIMP-1 ratio was higher in both groups of asthmatic children compared with controls. Inhaled budesonide increased TIMP-1 levels in both groups of asthmatic children and normalized the MMP-8/TIMP-1 ratio, and this paralleled the improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s in children with mild symptoms. At baseline, asthmatic children had significantly more MMP-8-positive macrophages than control children, whereas the number of TIMP-1-positive macrophages was almost the same. Budesonide decreased the percentage of MMP-8-positive macrophages and increased that of TIMP-1-positive macrophages; these changes were significant in asthmatic children with mild symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled budesonide normalized the MMP-8/TIMP-1 ratio in asthmatic children by upregulation of TIMP-1 production and downregulation of MMP-8 production by airway macrophages. This change may be a biochemical marker of an effect on airway inflammation and possibly of an ongoing remodeling process that should be further investigated using biopsy specimens.

Treatment with inhaled steroids in patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma but with normal lung function.

A total of 144 patients with lower airway symptoms suggestive of asthma, but who did not fulfil the functional criteria of asthma, were included in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled 8-week "proof-of-concept" study with mometasone furoate (MF), 400 microg once daily. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline in six morning and evening weekly symptom scores: cough, sputum production, wheeze, shortness of breath, chest tightness and exercise-induced cough/wheeze. Total symptom scores were calculated after treatment for 4 and 8 weeks. Compared with placebo, MF improved total morning symptom score at 8 weeks. Changes in total evening symptom scores did not differ between treatments. MF improved all individual symptom scores more than placebo, although the differences in changes between treatments were not always statistically significant. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates increased with MF compared with placebo. MF reduced eosinophils and the levels of eosinophilic cationic protein in induced sputum. The results show that symptoms suggestive of asthma exist in patients without significant beta(2)-agonist reversibility or diurnal variability in peak flow. Once-daily MF may benefit some of these patients and a short course with inhaled corticosteroids may be tried. Responders should be better identified in further studies.

Advances in asthma and COPD treatment: combination therapy with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta 2-agonists.

Asthma treatment guidelines advocate the use of long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) in addition to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients whose asthma is uncontrolled by ICS alone, thereby addressing two processes fundamental to asthma: bronchoconstriction and inflammation. Superior control--including a reduction in severe exacerbations--of asthma and COPD by ICS/LABA combination therapy has been demonstrated. Results from clinical studies suggest additive and potentially synergistic effects when the two agents are used in combination. No new safety-related issues have been identified with ICS/LABA compared with the monocomponents. The exact mechanisms for the enhanced efficacy of ICS/LABA combinations are under investigation but likely include drug interactions at the receptor level and interwoven signalling pathways, which may result in improved function of 2- adrenoceptors and steroid receptors. Data from preclinical studies provide evidence of additive, compensatory, complementary and synergistic effects of ICS and LABA in the control of inflammation and airway and lung remodelling. These effects may contribute to the improved efficacy seen when treating asthma and COPD with ICS/LABA combinations in clinical studies. Two ICS/LABA combination products are available: budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SeretideTM). An ICS/LABA combination in a single inhaler represent safe, effective and convenient treatment options for the management of patients with asthma and COPD. Clinical results also suggest that adjustable dosing with budesonide/formoterol provides better asthma control than fixed dosing. Further elucidation of the underlying mechanisms responsible for this superior disease control is needed.

Formoterol as needed with or without budesonide in patients with intermittent asthma and raised NO levels in exhaled air: A SOMA study.

Patients with mild intermittent asthma sometimes show signs of inflammation, and guidelines suggesting bronchodilator therapy alone as needed may be questioned. The current study compared as-needed use of a rapid-acting beta2-agonist with as-needed use of a beta2-agonist and corticosteroid combination as the only medication in asthma patients with intermittent symptoms. A total of 92 nonsmoking asthma patients (of 187 screened) using only an inhaled beta2-agonist as needed (28 males, 64 females; mean age 37 yrs; mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 101% predicted, mean reversibility 6.5% pred and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) > or =20 parts per billion (ppb)) were randomised to treatment with formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler) 4.5 microg as needed (n = 47) or budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler) 160/4.5 microg as needed (n = 45) in a double-blind, parallel-group 24-week study. The primary variable of efficacy was change in FeNO. Baseline FeNO was 60 ppb and 59 ppb in the budesonide/formoterol and formoterol groups, respectively. Mean reductions in FeNO in the budesonide/formoterol and formoterol groups were 18.2 ppb and 2.8 ppb, respectively (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.5-23.5 ppb). The reduction in the budesonide/formoterol group occurred during the first 4 weeks of treatment and remained at this low level. Mean FEV1 increased by 1.8% pred normal value in the budesonide/formoterol group and decreased by 0.9% pred normal value in the formoterol group (95% CI -4.7- -0.7). In the budesonide/formoterol group, use of > or =4 inhalations x day(-1) of study medication was seen on 21 treatment days compared with 74 in the formoterol group. In conclusion, as-needed use of an inhaled corticosteroid together with a rapid-acting bronchodilator may be more beneficial than a beta2-agonist alone in patients with intermittent asthma and signs of airway inflammation. The long-term benefits are unknown.

Formoterol Turbuhaler as reliever medication in patients with acute asthma.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of formoterol versus salbutamol as reliever medication in patients presenting at an emergency dept with acute asthma. A randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was performed in four Australian emergency treatment centres. The study included a total of 78 adult patients (mean baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.83 L; 59% predicted) with acute asthma. Based on the expected dose equivalence of formoterol Turbuhaler 4.5 microg (delivered dose) and salbutamol pressurised metered-dose inhaler 200 microg (metered dose), patients received a total of formoterol Turbuhaler 36 microg (delivered) or salbutamol pressurised metered-dose inhaler with spacer 1,600 microg (metered), divided into two equal doses at 0 and 30 min. FEV1, peak expiratory flow and systemic beta2-agonist effects were monitored for 4 h. The primary variable was FEV1% pred at 45 min. At 45 min, mean increases in FEV1 expressed in % pred were 6.6% and 9.3%, respectively, with a small adjusted mean difference in favour of salbutamol (3.0%, 95% confidence interval -2.0-8.0). Transient increases in systemic beta2-agonist effects occurred predominantly with salbutamol, although no significant treatment differences were observed. Eight patients discontinued due to adverse events. In this study of patients presenting at emergency depts with acute asthma, formoterol Turbuhaler 36 microg was well tolerated and, as rescue therapy, had an efficacy that was not different from that of salbutamol pressurised metered-dose inhaler with spacer 1,600 microg in the number of patients studied.

Asthma and COPD: differences and similarities. With special reference to the usefulness of budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler (Symbicort) in both diseases.

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) both have a high prevalence worldwide and yet each condition remains underdiagnosed. Despite a number of common features, these inflammatory respiratory syndromes have distinct clinical outcomes. COPD represents a greater economic burden than asthma because it has a less favourable prognosis and is associated with greater morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between these two diseases at an early stage, so that appropriate therapy can be prescribed to prevent deterioration. However, effective treatments that may be used in both conditions can minimise the effects of misdiagnosis and maximise the impact of treatment without the associated complexity when both conditions occur together. The current review summarises the differences and similarities of asthma and COPD, in terms of risk factors, pathophysiology, symptoms and diagnosis, to provide greater understanding of the role of budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler in both diseases.

Asthma control and steroid doses 5 years after early or delayed introduction of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: a real-life study.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated asthma control and medication use 5 years after introduction of an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide via Turbuhaler) in 462 patients with persistent asthma and symptoms of different duration. An early treatment group with symptoms for <2 years (group A) was compared with a delayed treatment group (group B) (median duration 5 years and 3 months). Most patients received budesonide 400 microg twice daily as initial dose. We report 5-year follow-up data on 404 patients (group A n = 253; group B n = 151) and on a few more patients after treatment for 6 months, 1 year and 3 years. At 5 years the mean maintenance doses of budesonide were 412 microg (A) and 825 microg (B), respectively (P<0.001). Nevertheless, treatment goals (normal lung function, normal exercise tolerance, minimal use of reliever medication, no asthma exacerbations) were all statistically significantly more frequently achieved in group A. At 5 years group B patients also used significantly more additional asthma medications, e.g. inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists by 64% compared with 6% in group A. In group A 43 patients (17%) had been able to stop budesonide treatment compared to five patients (3%) in group B. A subgroup of group B patients with higher mean baseline FEV1 values than group A showed nevertheless significantly poorer response. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Budesonide was well tolerated in both groups. CONCLUSION: Duration of asthma symptoms when starting treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid is an important determinant for the response. Early treatment gives significantly better airway function and asthma control than delayed treatment and at lower maintenance doses.

Formoterol (OXIS) Turbuhaler as a rescue therapy compared with salbutamol pMDI plus spacer in patients with acute severe asthma.

Formoterol has a similar onset of effect to salbutamol but a prolonged duration of action. However, the relative efficacy of the two drugs in acute severe asthma is not known. This double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of the maximum recommended daily dose of formoterol and a predicted equivalent dose of salbutamol in 88 patients presenting to the emergency department with acute severe asthma. Patients were randomized to formoterol 54 microg via Turbuhaler or salbutamol 2400 microg via pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) plus spacer in three equal doses over 1 h. Following the full dose, mean FEV1 at 75 min increased by 37% for formoterol and 28% for salbutamol (P = 0.18). The maximum increase in FEV1 over 4 h was significantly greater with formoterol compared with salbutamol (51% vs. 36%, respectively P < 0.05) and formoterol was as effective as salbutamol at improving symptoms and wellbeing. Both treatments were well tolerated. Formoterol caused a greater decrease in serum potassium (difference -0.2 mmol/l). In severe acute asthma, bronchodilator therapy with high-dose (54 microg) formoterol Turbuhaler provided equally rapid improvements in lung function of greater magnitude over 4 h than high-dose (2400 microg) salbutamol pMDI plus spacer.

Safety of formoterol by Turbuhaler as reliever medication compared with terbutaline in moderate asthma.

The present study compared the safety of 4.5 microg formoterol with 0.5 mg terbutaline, both by Turbuhaler and used as needed, in addition to regular formoterol in moderate asthma. In this double-blind parallel-group study, 357 patients taking a moderate-to-high dose of inhaled corticosteroids and additional terbutaline (2-5 inhalations x day(-1) during run-in) were randomised to either formoterol or terbutaline as needed in addition to formoterol 9 microg b.i.d. over 12 weeks. Adverse events, serum potassium levels, electrocardiogram, vital signs and lung function were assessed monthly; peak expiratory flow and severe asthma exacerbations were recorded daily. Patients used 2.16 (range 0.0-6.3) formoterol and 2.34 (range 0.1-7.5) terbutaline relief inhalations x day(-1). No clinically significant differences in safety variables were found between treatments. Statistically greater increases in cardiac frequency (2.6 beats x min(-1), p=0.03) were found on terbutaline. There were 44 and 52 severe asthma exacerbations with formoterol and terbutaline, respectively, with no significant difference in time to first exacerbation. There was also no difference between treatments for other efficacy measures (peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in one second and morning/evening symptom scores). Formoterol 4.5 microg as needed was at least as safe, well tolerated and effective as terbutaline 0.5 mg in stable patients (requiring up to 6 relief inhalations x day(-1)) taking formoterol plus inhaled corticosteroids regularly over 12 weeks.

Formoterol used as needed--clinical effectiveness.

A number of studies have already demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of formoterol when used as maintenance therapy in patients requiring both a beta2-agonist with a long duration of action and a regular inhaled corticosteroid. However, formoterol has a unique mechanism of action that gives it both fast- and long-acting properties. Hence the question arises as to whether formoterol can also be used as first-line reliever medication in addition to maintenance therapy. Compared with terbutaline, formoterol used as needed in steroid-treated mild to moderate asthma has superior efficacy, not only significantly improving peak flow, but also the exacerbation rate. In moderate to severe asthma, formoterol used as needed has demonstrated efficacy comparable with salbutamol and terbutaline in improving symptoms and lung function. Single doses of formoterol have also been shown to result in protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction for periods up to 12 h. Furthermore, bronchoprotection was maintained following repeated dosing, although further research is needed to confirm the duration of protection achieved with frequent and regular use. Initial research also suggests that formoterol is as effective and well tolerated as terbutaline in the treatment of acute asthma attacks. The evidence presented supports the use of formoterol on an as-needed basis for effective asthma control.

Efficacy of budesonide Turbuhaler compared with that of beclomethasone dipropionate pMDI in Japanese patients with moderately persistent asthma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide Turbuhaler with that of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) pMDI. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred and fifty adult asthma patients (mean age 52.7 years, mean baseline morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 294 L/min (< 80% predicted normal)), taking BDP via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI), 400 microg daily for at least 2 months, were randomized in an open 6 week study to receive daily doses of either budesonide 100 microg or 400 microg twice daily via Turbuhaler or continued treatment with BDP, 100 microg four times daily. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change in morning PEF from baseline to the end of treatment. Outcome was also assessed using symptom scores and investigators' assessments employed in Japanese clinical trials. RESULTS: At the end of the 6 week treatment period, mean morning PEF improved significantly from baseline in both budesonide groups, 16 L/min and 33 L/min in the 200 microg and 800 microg groups, respectively, but not in the BDP group, 5 L/min. There was no significant difference between 200 microg budesonide and 400 microg BDP treatment in the effect on PEF (P = 0.29), but 800 microg budesonide was significantly superior to BDP (P < 0.001). Final assessment of improvement and usefulness ratings showed that both budesonide treatments were significantly superior to BDP (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Budesonide Turbuhaler (200 microg) was as effective as 400 microg BDP pMDI. The efficacy of budesonide was improved significantly by increasing the dosage to 800 microg daily. The study design shows the importance of including a higher dose treatment group when comparing two formulations of inhaled corticosteroids in order to determine whether the treatments to be compared are on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Without that information, comparative studies are usually inconclusive.